DDane County
Elections

Materials
and exhibits.

DOCUMENT LIBRARY / EXHIBITS

Exhibits

Exhibit 01

Declassified CIA note

“Venezuela’s Electronic Voting Manipulation Capabilities,” dated June 29, 2026.

6 PAGES
Exhibit 1, page 1 of 6: cover page of a CIA Note titled “Summary of Select Intelligence Reporting from 2004-2020 on Venezuela’s Electronic Voting Manipulation Capabilities,” dated 29 June 2026 and marked declassified and approved for public release.
Exhibit 1 · Page 1 of 6
Exhibit 1, page 2 of 6: CIA Note summary reporting that 2004-2020 intelligence documented persistent concerns about Venezuelan government manipulation of electronic voting systems, including Smartmatic technology, followed by a scope note and a section on Venezuelan government interest in election manipulation.
Exhibit 1 · Page 2 of 6
Exhibit 1, page 3 of 6: CIA Note describing plans to deploy preprogrammed voting machines in Venezuela’s 2012 election, a 2013 “Devil’s Advocacy” alternative analysis of how large-scale manipulation could occur undetected, and technical capabilities and vulnerabilities of electronic voting systems.
Exhibit 1 · Page 3 of 6
Exhibit 1, page 4 of 6: CIA Note listing a September 2020 election-manipulation technique that would replicate hash files, mimic voting machines favoring the ruling party, overwrite opposing machines’ hash files, and make altered votes appear to come from legitimate machines, plus IC assessments of Smartmatic and Sequoia Voting Systems.
Exhibit 1 · Page 4 of 6
Exhibit 1, page 5 of 6: CIA Note limitations and analytic caveats noting that neither Smartmatic nor the Venezuelan government had the access needed to manipulate an election outside Venezuela, that CIA’s baseline assessment found no large-scale electronic fraud in Venezuela’s 2012 election, and that the 2013 Devil’s Advocacy report was an alternative analysis rather than a finding.
Exhibit 1 · Page 5 of 6
Exhibit 1, page 6 of 6: final CIA Note page occupied almost entirely by heavily redacted source-note lines, with the printed page number 5.
Exhibit 1 · Page 6 of 6
Download original PDF ↗
Exhibit 02

WinEDS upgrade

Subject line and supporting material from the 2011 email exhibit.

1 PAGE
Exhibit 2: February 2011 email from Craig Short with the subject “Re: WinEDS upgrade,” warning that upgrading the election database deletes all stored procedures, above the original message from Kevin Paul reporting that the export function failed after a server upgrade.
Exhibit 2
Download original PDF ↗
Exhibit 03

WinEDS use confirmed

2011 email concerning two servers, differing Windows systems, and WinEDS.

1 PAGE
Exhibit 3: February 2011 email chain in which Mike Frontera of Dominion Voting states that tabulation laptops for the scanner must run Windows 7 while the fully installed WinEDS laptops for Clerk, Warehouse and Registrar must run XP, and Sherri Hadskey of the Louisiana Secretary of State asks whether two different programming stations would then be required.
Exhibit 3
Download original PDF ↗
Exhibit 04

WinEDS information loading

2020 email about loading information through Cartridge Manager into WinEDS.

1 PAGE
Exhibit 4: October 2020 Dominion Voting email from Alex Soto Vasquez stating there is an additional 60 minutes to import files through Cartridge Manager before they go into WinEDS, with that passage highlighted in a red box.
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 05

Coomer / WinEDS email

2020 email chain concerning cartridges and information loaded as results arrive.

4 PAGES
Exhibit 5, page 1 of 4: October 2020 Dominion Voting email chain “Re: Chicago EV tabulators” in which Goran Obradovic estimates up to 6,000 ballots per EV machine and Eric Coomer replies that 30 minutes is the maximum for 12,000 ballots.
Exhibit 5 · Page 1 of 4
Exhibit 5, page 2 of 4: October 2020 Dominion Voting email from Alex Soto Vasquez describing 90 minutes total per cartridge, followed by Mark McKinney’s reply about file sizes and concern for Cook County.
Exhibit 5 · Page 2 of 4
Exhibit 5, page 3 of 4: October 2020 Dominion Voting email chain in which Eric Coomer warns that half an hour per cartridge would run well over 24 hours if every cartridge holds 12,000 votes, and Martijn Punt confirms the estimate is still being tested.
Exhibit 5 · Page 3 of 4
Exhibit 5, page 4 of 4: October 2020 Dominion Voting email from Martijn Punt recommending RTR configuration and timeout changes to load early-voting results from a directory, and reporting a test of 57 result files each holding 12,000 QR ballots.
Exhibit 5 · Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 06

Edmundo Rojas / Liberty Vote

Work-history material referencing Dominion and Liberty Vote.

1 PAGE
Exhibit 6: LinkedIn profile page for Edmundo Rojas, Senior Product Specialist at Dominion Voting Systems, listing Liberty Vote and American River College and work history as Senior Product Specialist (contract) at Liberty Vote, with the key fields marked in red.
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 07

VPN and virtual machine

2020 email imagery discussing a VPN connection and virtual machine.

1 PAGE
Exhibit 7: two stacked close-ups of a 30 March 2020 email titled “RE: VPN access with City” stating that a VPN connection was established from a new virtual machine so the team could reach the EMS servers, with the key lines outlined in magenta.
Exhibit 7
Exhibit 08

Serbia / Shanghai correspondence

Correspondence concerning a tablet and Shanghai customs.

1 PAGE
Exhibit 8: two stacked email excerpts — a Dominion Voting signature block for Djordje Matijevic, Manager, Software Development, in Belgrade, Serbia, and a message noting that a tablet has arrived at Shanghai customs and is expected the following week.
Exhibit 8
← Back to the narrative