How to Rig an Election 9/10/2026
Rasmussen polls find two-thirds of voters across party lines are concerned about “machines flipping votes.”
These concerns are justified but it’s hard for most voters to defend their position given the complexities of the election technology and processes, and their use to corrupt election results.
It’s best to address voter concerns by segmenting election problems: 1) the voter database and its management, 2) election modeling and outcome prediction, and 3) the electronic voting system, both hardware and software.
The database issue is first a problem of bloat in the voter rolls, specifically the accumulation of voters who are deceased, moved, illegal, or non-existent. Many of these ineligible voters haven’t been purged per state statutes, or have been hurriedly added by registration mills in the run-up to elections. Database bloat provides headroom to keep vote totals including ballot injections at historic voter participation levels, roughly 78% in presidential elections to avoid raising suspicions.
The second aspect of the database problem is the management or rather mismanagement of databases to enable “ballot stuffing”. Investigators report the conversion of inactive ineligible voters to active, special tags and even cryptographic shuffling to disburse or hide unpurged ineligibles.
Good election models can predict the number of ballots needed to prevail in election prior election day. Historic voter participation and preference research generate strong models. The models become references by which early voting data predicts election outcomes.
To the electronic voting systems issue, qualified specialists have been reporting serious vulnerabilities for more than 15 years. There are too many to fully explain all of them here other than to summarize as multiple ‘backdoors’ and vote manipulation methods, bad coding practices, weak communications port protections, hidden nefarious features and lies about equipment sources.
The general consensus of specialists is that it’s impossible to make an electronic voting system impervious to bad actors, particularly foreign states and hackers using artificial intelligence tools.
Below, we walk the reader through one election rigging scenario with relevant videos, court evidence emails, and other relevant materials.
Database Step
Dr. Frank explains database bloat that begins with normal churn reflecting voter deaths and relocations. Many of these database entrees are not being purged per statutes but rather left to become inactive after a no-vote period. Registration mills and pre-election individual registrations add to the bloat during a mandated “no-purge” pre-election window. Dr. Frank teaches a method to identify ineligible database entrees.
Dr. Frank Video (Relevant portion of “Churn” presentation)
Dr. Frank Bio
Election Prediction Step
The website https://www.electiondataguy.com is representative of organizations that project election results by analyzing early vote data against that of past comparable elections.
WI early voting data is available by subscription at https://badgervoters.wi.gov
Voting System Step
In the Byrne video below, Patrick reveals a hidden server that injects ballots.
Patrick Byrne video
Patrick’s plastic cup explanation of the hidden server was intended for a non-technical audience. The hidden server is not, in fact a separate physical module but rather a virtual machine, a compute resource implemented in software. It uses a portion of processor time in a host computer, in this case an existing election management server. Virtual machines can self-terminate and disappear with all evidence, in this case ballot injections when the system is powered off.
Patrick Byrne Bio
Patrick M. Byrne is an entrepreneur, scholar, and advocate best known as the founder and former CEO of Overstock.com. Beginning in 1999, he developed the online retailer into a major shopping platform, led it to its first full year of profitability in 2009, and oversaw early adoption of Bitcoin transactions and digital bonds issued on the Bitcoin blockchain. He later founded Medici Ventures to explore blockchain technology for securities trading and served as chairman of the Friedman Foundation for School Choice.
Byrne holds a bachelor’s degree from Dartmouth College, a master’s degree in philosophy from the University of Cambridge as a Marshall Scholar, and a Stanford University PhD in Constitutional Intellectual Origins.
Visit Patrick Byrne’s website →
Courtesy of Election Crime Bureau.
Patrick presents a number of court evidence emails that confirm the existence of the hidden server and tie Dominion to that server.
- Exhibit 1: Declassified CIA report “Venezuela’s Electronic Voting Manipulation Capabilities”
- Exhibit 2: Subject line in 2011 Email, WinEDS upgrade.
- Exhibit 3: 2011 Email, Louisiana Sec of State questions need for 2 servers with different Windows OS for Dominion’s Democracy Suite election management system. Responder indicates one is for WinEDS.
- Exhibit 4: 2020 Email, Dominion Tech discusses loading of info into WinEDS. Dominion’s been claiming WinEDS old stuff not used.
- Exhibit 5: 2020 Email, Coomer says can download cartridges [info from Serbia] overnight and as they “come in” [election results) we can load into WinEDS {ballot injection}.
- Exhibit 6: Link-in page of Edmundo Rojas, Senior Product Specialist - work history with both Dominion and Liberty Vote. Dominion and Liberty Vote are same company with new owner.
- Exhibit 7: 2020 Email Dominion Tech “Establish VPN connection virtual machine created today”
- Exhibit 8: Email from Serbia – “tablet arrives at Shanghai custom … expecting next week.”
- Exhibit 9: Liberty Vote web page showing tablet. Increasing number of Chinese manufactured products being banned for having spyware and backdoor control features.
Patrick has been subject to a gag order during a lawsuit by Dominion that was intended to bury system information including the hidden server. 3 years into the case, the judge was discovered to have hidden previous representation of Venezuela, the source of the SmartMatic software at the root of WinEDS. The judge has been referred to DOJ.
